By accident I shot various images of SH2-112 and SH2-115:
Both nebulae: | SH2-112 only | SH2-115 only |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21f93/21f93f526708162ee31b1f14d7c934847debd405" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52c1a/52c1ad73c85bda26f2e0376fa40abd596250caf6" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6059/f60594217ee0734c20cff50c97ebc80e4787bfad" alt="" |
I was wondering about ways to combine these:
- Treating them as a mosaic, i.e. preprocess separately and then combine (using Average - not Overlay in GradientMergeMosaic!!!)
- Preprocessing them combined
The first one was fairly straight-forward. I preprocessed them as I always do and then used the
GradientMergeMosaic process in Pixinsight.
For the second one, I did the following:
- weighted them together
- calibrated them separately
- registered them to one of the images that has both nebulae
- stacked them together
Here is the outcome of both processes:
Mosaic | Preprocessed combined |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae1d3/ae1d3f2a164adce6dc7a11f2db3c5392c4cc2a83" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9a9a/e9a9ab9f5217cd28bea44c267acbb849e7772f9f" alt="" |
Well, that's pretty clear ...
But I still wanted to find out if the stacking of all images improved the quality of the image. So, I cut out SH2-115 from both images and compared those:
SH2-15 in mosaic | SH2-115 in combined image |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/189c5/189c5cd60bd725b1108baf7c1a19f364558380af" alt="" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/748ef/748ef66aad5fdc4bbae450a7c9616916fa598fbb" alt="" |
Interestingly enough, the mosaic image seems to have a slightly higher SNR. So, I'll go with that method.